On Friday, February 17, 2012, Jun Heider wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Omar Gonzalez > > <omarg.develo...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> ...Unless there are objections if there is a "lazy consensus" reached > there is > >> no need to [VOTE] on everything... > > > > Agreed, but IMO the standard way to ask for lazy consensus is a [LAZY] > > marker in a subject line, it would be good for Flex to adopt that > > convention. > > > > -Bertrand > > In the future I would have to agree with Bertrand on this [LAZY] marker > adoption. This will allow us to skim this busy list when we're swamped with > paid work and pay more attention when we're not. Also as Bertrand mentioned > in the previous response, if this decision had been made and I missed it, > then yes...definitely my problem. > > Thanks all. > > I have no problem doing it again, that's why I asked in this thread. I have not publishe the text yet and I'm still learning the ins and outs. I have been trying to move this forward for a week now.
-omar
