On Friday, February 17, 2012, Jun Heider wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > > > I'm not really seeing any opposition to FlexUnit and Mockolate as the > unit > > testing and mocking libraries we should adopt. Unless I get some > objections > > before EOD tomorrow I'm going to assume we've reached a consensus on this > > and add some verbiage to the project site to communicate which libraries > > we'll be working with for unit testing the framework. > > > > -- > > Omar Gonzalez > > s9tpep...@apache.org <javascript:;> > > Hi Omar, sorry for the late response. In addition to this post I also saw > some conversation on some commits from you regarding this verbiage. > > Two reasons for my tardiness: > > 1. Been swamped with tons of client work lately. > > 2. This was marked as [DECISION]. Seeing this post makes me wonder, can we > here at Apache Flex adopt something holistically without a [VOTE] thread? > To be quite honest this mailing list is so busy that when I get busy as in > #1 above, I have a tendency to skim my inbox for threads marked with [VOTE]. > > That being said, I'm personally not contesting FlexUnit and Mockolate, but > on the other hand can we realistically say that something has been adopted > into the project without a proper [VOTE] thread? > > Maybe one of the mentors can set me straight?
The short answer is yes. Unless there are objections if there is a "lazy consensus" reached there is no need to [VOTE] on everything, we'd never get anything done that way I imagine. You can read more on the decision making process here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html -omar
