On Friday, February 17, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Jun Heider <j...@realeyes.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > ...can we realistically say that something has been adopted into the > project > > without a proper [VOTE] thread? > > > > Maybe one of the mentors can set me straight?.. > > The final rule IMO is that decisions must be made by consensus. > > A [VOTE] is definitely consensus, if someone misses that it's their > problem. > > Any other form of consensus can be challenged, because it's too easy > to miss on a busy list. > > I've just added a note to > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Started about > [DECISION] which is confusing, will discuss in a separate thread. > > BTW, in my opinion there's not much benefit in deciding for one test > framework or another until there are *actual tests in svn* that people > can use to make an opinion. Code speaks louder than words. > > -Bertrand >
Here's a link: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/flex/whiteboard/s9tpepper/validators/src-tests/org/apache/flex/validators/StringValidatorTests.as?revision=1237166&view=markup -omar
