Hi,

> We can use it 'referentially', but not the icon.  I think that means we can
> say that it works with or for Adobe Flash Builder, but we cannot call it
> "Adobe Flash Builder Packager".
Fair enough.

> What changes are you referring to?
The new additional XML file. The packager could create this file as nothing 
else other than a future version of FB needs it I can;t see why it why should 
be it part of the Apache SDK. If it is added is it then OK to add other files 
for other IDEs?

Think
Justin

Reply via email to