On 6/9/12 1:12 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> We can use it 'referentially', but not the icon.  I think that means we can
>> say that it works with or for Adobe Flash Builder, but we cannot call it
>> "Adobe Flash Builder Packager".
> Fair enough.
> 
>> What changes are you referring to?
> The new additional XML file. The packager could create this file as nothing
> else other than a future version of FB needs it I can;t see why it why should
> be it part of the Apache SDK. If it is added is it then OK to add other files
> for other IDEs?
Interesting idea, but it would be better to have the file in SVN as it would
be easier to change if needed.  And other IDEs are welcome to have files
they need as well, IMO.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to