> sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > designer. It actually IS clear. Look at the faq section on the page Scott provided in his first mail. To make it short: UI Designer was removed in 4.7.
Btw: This is my first response to this Mailing List, though following since beginning of this year. Im going to write a 'introducing myself' mail asap! Cheers Phillip Lüdeling mobile mail Am 19.09.2012 um 15:31 schrieb Charles Monteiro <char...@nycsmalltalk.org>: > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > designer. > > Thanks > On Sep 18, 2012 8:27 PM, "Scott Castle" <scas...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>>> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? >> We've made a number of changes to how Flash Builder deals with SDK >> identification and versioning to permit it to work with new Apache SDKs, >> both the current 4.8 drop as well as future versions (there's a lot of >> quirky behavior we've seen dropping new SDKs into 4.6). We've also done >> extensive testing, which isn't directly visible as a new feature but >> should ensure a much smoother user experience. >> >> - Scott >> >> >> >> On 9/18/12 4:11 PM, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: >> >>> On 9/18/2012 4:26 PM, Scott Castle wrote: >>>> Hi Flex developers, >>>> >>>> I wanted to let the list know that the latest version of Flash Builder >>>> is >>>> currently in public beta with support for Apache Flex 4.8. >>> What does this mean? I couldn't figure out how Flash Builder 4.7 >>> support for Apache Flex is any different than Flash Builder 4.6 support >>> for Apache Flex. >>> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? >>> >>> I understand we can set up the Apache Flex SDK; but saw nothing else. >>> There is no documentation [that I could find] about what that support >>> actually means, or how it translates into a Flash Builder feature that >>> was not there before. >>> >>> [Thank you for 64-bit Flash Builder, though] >>> >> >>
