Ah thanks, he had explicitly answered my other question i assumed he would do so for this.
Dropping ui designer is a huge drag On Sep 19, 2012 9:43 AM, "Phillip" <p...@easee.de> wrote: > > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > > designer. > It actually IS clear. Look at the faq section on the page Scott provided > in his first mail. To make it short: UI Designer was removed in 4.7. > > Btw: This is my first response to this Mailing List, though following > since beginning of this year. Im going to write a 'introducing myself' mail > asap! > > Cheers > Phillip Lüdeling > > mobile mail > > Am 19.09.2012 um 15:31 schrieb Charles Monteiro <char...@nycsmalltalk.org > >: > > > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > > designer. > > > > Thanks > > On Sep 18, 2012 8:27 PM, "Scott Castle" <scas...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >>>> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? > >> We've made a number of changes to how Flash Builder deals with SDK > >> identification and versioning to permit it to work with new Apache SDKs, > >> both the current 4.8 drop as well as future versions (there's a lot of > >> quirky behavior we've seen dropping new SDKs into 4.6). We've also done > >> extensive testing, which isn't directly visible as a new feature but > >> should ensure a much smoother user experience. > >> > >> - Scott > >> > >> > >> > >> On 9/18/12 4:11 PM, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 9/18/2012 4:26 PM, Scott Castle wrote: > >>>> Hi Flex developers, > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to let the list know that the latest version of Flash Builder > >>>> is > >>>> currently in public beta with support for Apache Flex 4.8. > >>> What does this mean? I couldn't figure out how Flash Builder 4.7 > >>> support for Apache Flex is any different than Flash Builder 4.6 support > >>> for Apache Flex. > >>> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? > >>> > >>> I understand we can set up the Apache Flex SDK; but saw nothing else. > >>> There is no documentation [that I could find] about what that support > >>> actually means, or how it translates into a Flash Builder feature that > >>> was not there before. > >>> > >>> [Thank you for 64-bit Flash Builder, though] > >>> > >> > >> >
