Thanks On Sep 19, 2012 9:54 AM, "Mark Shen" <markshen2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> no UI designer in FB4.7 > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Charles Monteiro > <char...@nycsmalltalk.org>wrote: > > > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > > designer. > > > > Thanks > > On Sep 18, 2012 8:27 PM, "Scott Castle" <scas...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > >> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? > > > We've made a number of changes to how Flash Builder deals with SDK > > > identification and versioning to permit it to work with new Apache > SDKs, > > > both the current 4.8 drop as well as future versions (there's a lot of > > > quirky behavior we've seen dropping new SDKs into 4.6). We've also > done > > > extensive testing, which isn't directly visible as a new feature but > > > should ensure a much smoother user experience. > > > > > > - Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/12 4:11 PM, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On 9/18/2012 4:26 PM, Scott Castle wrote: > > > >> Hi Flex developers, > > > >> > > > >> I wanted to let the list know that the latest version of Flash > Builder > > > >>is > > > >> currently in public beta with support for Apache Flex 4.8. > > > > What does this mean? I couldn't figure out how Flash Builder 4.7 > > > >support for Apache Flex is any different than Flash Builder 4.6 > support > > > >for Apache Flex. > > > > How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? > > > > > > > > I understand we can set up the Apache Flex SDK; but saw nothing > else. > > > >There is no documentation [that I could find] about what that support > > > >actually means, or how it translates into a Flash Builder feature that > > > >was not there before. > > > > > > > > [Thank you for 64-bit Flash Builder, though] > > > > > > > > > > > > >
