On 11/15/12 12:24 PM, "sébastien Paturel" <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So it means that Flex in AS2 was not flex?
It was then, but now now.
> 
> 
> Le 15/11/2012 20:50, Alex Harui a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/15/12 11:44 AM, "sébastien Paturel" <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Why do you thing that using AS4 is the better choice?
>>> It brings me back to the thread (what is the essence of Flex?) In my
>>> opinion, flex is not tight to actionscript.
>> IMO, Flex is AS3.  My assumption is that there are large bodies of AS
>> business logic that folks are not wanting to port to something else.  Of
>> course, that assumption could be incorrect.
>> 
> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to