On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I tried it because Logan's concrete example used it, and I thought it > was some uber-artifact. I already had this:
Sorry, trunk is changing more than I expected. This should work better: http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/branches/flex-mojos-2.0.x/test-harness/projects/concept/updated-sdk/pom.xml > <build> > <plugins> > <plugin> > <groupId>info.flex-mojos</groupId> > <artifactId>flex-compiler-mojo</artifactId> > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> > <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> > <type>pom</type> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > </plugin> > </plugins> > </build> That looks fine to me. Do you also have the flex-framework dependency as well with the new version? <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> <type>pom</type> </dependency> </dependencies> Logan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
