If I recall correctly that is fixed on 2.0.1 VELO
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]> wrote: > Now that I've deleted my 3.1SDK from the internal repository, I am > attempting to install 3.2 and get the error below. > The only slightly unusual thing I did was copy datavisualization.swc and > datavisualization_rb.swc into the freshly-downloaded SDK. > > Uploading: > http://builds.verdiem.net/artifactory/libs-releases/com/adobe/flex/framework/flex-framework/3.2.0-fb3/flex-framework-3.2.0-fb3.pom > 2K uploaded > [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from internal.repo > [INFO] repository metadata for: 'artifact > com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework' could not be found on repository: > internal.repo, so will be created > [INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'artifact > com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework' > Uploading: > http://builds.verdiem.net/artifactory/libs-releases/com/adobe/flex/framework/air-framework/3.2.0-fb3/air-framework-3.2.0-fb3.pom > 3K uploaded > [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from internal.repo > [INFO] repository metadata for: 'artifact > com.adobe.flex.framework:air-framework' could not be found on repository: > internal.repo, so will be created > [INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'artifact > com.adobe.flex.framework:air-framework' > Ignoring duplicate entry: runtimes/air/mac/Adobe > AIR.framework/Versions/1.0/Adobe AIR > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Unable to create fdk-bundle > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No Flex 3 so far. >> >> Flex 4 only after released. >> >> Try to run again from a fresh repo. Not sure, something looks corrupted. >> It shouldn't be asking for 3.2.0...... dependencies. >> >> >> VELO >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yes, I do have the framework dependency as well, and everything builds. >>> You're working with Flex 4, right? My use of 3.1.0-fb3 is correct, given >>> that that's what I used in the local Artifactory repository? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:12 PM, RedBugz Software <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > No, I tried it because Logan's concrete example used it, and I thought >>>> it >>>> > was some uber-artifact. I already had this: >>>> >>>> Sorry, trunk is changing more than I expected. This should work better: >>>> >>>> http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/branches/flex-mojos-2.0.x/test-harness/projects/concept/updated-sdk/pom.xml >>>> >>>> > <build> >>>> > <plugins> >>>> > <plugin> >>>> > <groupId>info.flex-mojos</groupId> >>>> > <artifactId>flex-compiler-mojo</artifactId> >>>> > <dependencies> >>>> > <dependency> >>>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> >>>> > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> >>>> > <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> >>>> > <type>pom</type> >>>> > </dependency> >>>> > </dependencies> >>>> > </plugin> >>>> > </plugins> >>>> > </build> >>>> >>>> That looks fine to me. Do you also have the flex-framework dependency >>>> as well with the new version? >>>> <dependencies> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> >>>> <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> >>>> <type>pom</type> >>>> </dependency> >>>> </dependencies> >>>> >>>> Logan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
