Now that I've deleted my 3.1SDK from the internal repository, I am attempting to install 3.2 and get the error below. The only slightly unusual thing I did was copy datavisualization.swc and datavisualization_rb.swc into the freshly-downloaded SDK.
Uploading: http://builds.verdiem.net/artifactory/libs-releases/com/adobe/flex/framework/flex-framework/3.2.0-fb3/flex-framework-3.2.0-fb3.pom 2K uploaded [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from internal.repo [INFO] repository metadata for: 'artifact com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework' could not be found on repository: internal.repo, so will be created [INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'artifact com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework' Uploading: http://builds.verdiem.net/artifactory/libs-releases/com/adobe/flex/framework/air-framework/3.2.0-fb3/air-framework-3.2.0-fb3.pom 3K uploaded [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from internal.repo [INFO] repository metadata for: 'artifact com.adobe.flex.framework:air-framework' could not be found on repository: internal.repo, so will be created [INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'artifact com.adobe.flex.framework:air-framework' Ignoring duplicate entry: runtimes/air/mac/Adobe AIR.framework/Versions/1.0/Adobe AIR [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Unable to create fdk-bundle On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > No Flex 3 so far. > > Flex 4 only after released. > > Try to run again from a fresh repo. Not sure, something looks corrupted. > It shouldn't be asking for 3.2.0...... dependencies. > > > VELO > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes, I do have the framework dependency as well, and everything builds. >> You're working with Flex 4, right? My use of 3.1.0-fb3 is correct, given >> that that's what I used in the local Artifactory repository? >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:12 PM, RedBugz Software <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > No, I tried it because Logan's concrete example used it, and I thought >>> it >>> > was some uber-artifact. I already had this: >>> >>> Sorry, trunk is changing more than I expected. This should work better: >>> >>> http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/branches/flex-mojos-2.0.x/test-harness/projects/concept/updated-sdk/pom.xml >>> >>> > <build> >>> > <plugins> >>> > <plugin> >>> > <groupId>info.flex-mojos</groupId> >>> > <artifactId>flex-compiler-mojo</artifactId> >>> > <dependencies> >>> > <dependency> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> >>> > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> >>> > <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> >>> > <type>pom</type> >>> > </dependency> >>> > </dependencies> >>> > </plugin> >>> > </plugins> >>> > </build> >>> >>> That looks fine to me. Do you also have the flex-framework dependency >>> as well with the new version? >>> <dependencies> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> >>> <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> >>> <type>pom</type> >>> </dependency> >>> </dependencies> >>> >>> Logan >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
