And finally, do you wish me to update the flex sdk version to 3.5 or do you prefer to have flexmojos 3 sticking to 3.2? Actually in my tests I've used 3.5.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:12, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote: > The two poms involved are flexmojos-testing/flexmojos-fbtest-harness > and flexmojos-testing/flexmojos-test-harness: they both refer to a > 3.8-SNAPSHOT parent which actually is 3.9-SNAPSHOT. > > This lead to a non working parent pom resolution. > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:02, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I've seen you have pulled my changes: are you going to release the changes >> soon or do you prefer to wait a little bit? I think I've found a couple of >> errors in the poms too, as they reference the old 3.8-SNAPSHOT instead of >> the 3.9-SNAPSHOT... If you search for the `3.8-SNAPSHOT` string you can find >> them, but if you prefer I can submit another change. >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 22:22, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I've pushed the changes to my fork, waiting for your comments. >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 13:31, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, I'll give a look on how much it need to be changed to fix our >>>> needs.... I'll be back to you soon on this >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:29, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, have 2 goal with similar logic means one will evolve and the >>>>> other will be forgotten =/ >>>>> >>>>> Also, CopyMojo also has logic to deal with modules, runtime >>>>> localization and rsls.... this DependencyProcessorMojo only covers >>>>> RSLs.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> VELO >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If you prefer I can patch that goal, but I think a different goal >>>>>> better fit our needs. The CopyMojo works perfectly for war files and I >>>>>> love >>>>>> it, patching it can lead to a lot os switches in the code bacause of >>>>>> different default output directories, different artifact ype, etc... And >>>>>> I >>>>>> didn't want to break anything in the existing code so no complains will >>>>>> raise on the new version as many people is still using that version. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just wished to be on the safe side and I thought adding a different >>>>>> mojo could be the safest solution... But I see your point and I can >>>>>> refactor >>>>>> the CopyMojo if you wish.... still I think it's not the safest solution. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:51, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see the point on creating a second goal that does almost the >>>>>>> same thing.... it would make more sense patch the goal that already >>>>>>> exists >>>>>>> then.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, it partially overlap but the CopyMojo works on war artifacts >>>>>>>> only while we wish to copy dependent artifacts into SWF project as >>>>>>>> well for >>>>>>>> testing purposes: our flex project is modular and we want to test it >>>>>>>> out of >>>>>>>> the scope of a war file... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The alternative was to process the dependencies, including >>>>>>>> transitive ones, and copy all the artifacts using the dependency >>>>>>>> plugin, but >>>>>>>> as we use non-standard scopes (rsl, caching) which change the artifact >>>>>>>> type >>>>>>>> `on the fly` it was not applicable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you see my point or should I further explain? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 23:37, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What is this DependencyProcessorMojo for? Doesn't it overlay >>>>>>>>> CopyMojo? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> VELO >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roberto Lo Giacco < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Pull request made, but I think I've to process the additional >>>>>>>>>> `cache` scope into the DependencyProcessorMojo... but I'm not sure... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:44, Marvin Froeder >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Pushing to my fork right now. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok, make pull requests to my fork and I will take a look ASAP. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> VELO >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>>> >>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>> >>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
