Well, what I want to achieve is exactly to avoid having that dependencies
included in the compiler as they are modules, so the dependency is of type
swf and scope runtime. But I still want the swf module to be copied in the
webapp folder. Do you get my point?

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 14:26, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I've found a bug in the copy-flex-dependencies goal regarding
>> versionRange, actually that mojo is unable to work with version ranges...
>>
>> In addition that goal uses compile time dependencies but I think it should
>> use runtime dependencies as module swf should have a runtime scope... am i
>> right?
>>
> Flexmojos doesn't deal with runtime dependecies.... compile, included,
> merged, external, rsl, caching or test.
>
>
> And if you put scope as runtime I'm not sure it will include compile
> deps....
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to