Er, I don’t think the JRun license
is a full license with Flex, it’s just a trial license.
Scott, I’d just talk to your sales
rep and see what makes sense for your needs. I have no idea how the pricing
works on JRun vs. CF Enterprise.
well the actual legal (Commercial) FLEX license is being sent
(currently FEDEX) but i have the serial, and
simply used the
downloadable version to install.
that being said, once i provide the serial it
doesn't ask how i want
it installed, but simply installs the WAR?
am i missing something from this equation?
On 5/12/05, Cliff Meyers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you purchase a Flex license it comes with
a full license of JRun.
> When you run the Flex installer you can
either have it create a .war
> file to deploy to an existing J2EE server, or
choose to install JRun4
> on your server and then put Flex on top of
it. The same is true of
> ColdFusion MX7: if you spring for an Enterprise license you
can
> install CF with a full version of JRun4, or
as a .war to deploy to any
> other J2EE server. You could also
install CFMX7 in Standalone mode,
> but IMHO this would be waste since you'd be
sacrificing the full J2EE
> capability (Servlets, JSPs, EJBs, etc) as
well as some other features
> in CFMX7 Enterprise Edition. If you want to
deploy CFMX7 and Flex on
> top of the same J2EE server (be it the
"free" JRun you get with the
> CF/Flex licenses or any other J2EE server)
you're still going to need
> the CFMX7 Enterprise edition.
>
> If you are looking for the most
cost-effective route, you can do the following:
>
> (1) Buy a Flex license and install it on a
box with the full version
> of JRun that's included,
> (2) Buy a CFMX7 Standard license and install
it on a different box in
> Standalone mode
>
> You might also be able to run them side by
side on the same box, but
> usually I think MM will discourage that
behavior since having two JRun
> servers on the same box will probably cause
issues. Port conflicts
> immediately jump to mind since different
parts of the J2EE machinery
> will probably try to bind to the same default
ports, although you
> could probaby adjust the .xml config files to
resolve this. However
> you're also going to add a lot more overhead
to your hardware by
> running two separate J2EE servers on the same
box. If your company is
> willing to spring for the hefty price tag of
Flex, is the difference
> between CFMX7 Standard and Enterprise really that significant?
>
> HTH,
>
> Cliff
>
>
> On 5/11/05, Scott
Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In order to install FLEX you need an
existing Java Application Server,
> > now we own CF7 Standard not Enterprise.
> >
> > 1) Would it be more cost effective to
buy JRUN 4 (standalone) and
> > deploy CF7/FLEX war files to JRUN4
> >
> > 2) Buy / Updared CF7 Standard to
Enterpise and deploy FLEX via this route.
> >
> > I'm not really up to speed on whats what
in terms of Java Application
> > Server(s) but need to have a setup where
i can hopefully have FLEX/CF
> > running under the one port (was going to
use a CFIMPORT capability but
> > CF7 Standard has a software license
restriction on JSP apparently).
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Scott Barnes
> > http://www.mossyblog.com
> > http://www.flexcoder.com
(Coming Soon)
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.mossyblog.com
http://www.flexcoder.com
(Coming Soon)
Yahoo! Groups Links
