I'm not sure whether or not it'll be archived or not. Just send our sales guy an email and he can schedule my time for a demo on Adobe Connect. sales [at] nitrolm.com
-Andrew On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there going to be an archived webcast afterwards? I'd love to go to > that but unfortunately; August is the busiest time of the year for me and my > clients. > > > > Scott > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Andrew Westberg > *Sent:* Sunday, August 03, 2008 5:45 PM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* {Disarmed} Re: [flexcoders] SWF/Flex security > > > > I'll be speaking on this topic at 360 Flex San Jose. At the basic level, > you can embed or even encrypt secure information such as > usernames/passwords. If you need a full blown authentication and encryption > system, I'd look into nitrolm.com. This will be discussed at the 360 > presentation along with some other non-commercial techniques you can use on > your own. > > > http://www.360conferences.com/360flex/2008/04/360flex-san-jose-schedule.html > > -Andrew Westberg > > On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In preparing for securing the site before I code the main site functions I > thought I'd read up a bit on security. I was thinking that flex/swf code > could not be decompiled. But then I found this: > http://blog.everythingflex.com/2008/02/29/check-you-as3-code/ > > > > I'd like to do some remote object validation (adding in another field for > the remote object that would verify that the request was coming from my SWF > and not someone else's (possibly malicious) code. However, if someone can > decompile my SWF files then all of that would be for nothing. What can > people say about flex code decompiling and protecting my code from prying > eyes? > > > > Regards, > > Scott > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. > >
