No Robert I won't. You talk over people and most are passive and let you spew.
I would LOVE to see you get me off this list. A petition, can you not see the irony? There is no petition man, it's in your head. I have never seen someone say FO on this list. Maybe you should ask yourself why Josh said that to you. The way you speak and have spoken, you make yourself out like you have done nothing to insult or otherwise jam needles paragraphs in between short questions and answers. I'm sure I am just one of those people, you just will never like. I'll do you a favor and end this thread, but I'll open my mouth again if I feel your stomping on this list's passiveness again. Besides, I really don't want your huge rants in the archives, but now I have got dirty with you as well. That's ok with me though since I have always loved the sandbox. PS Yahoo police, come and get me. I have helped with 1000's of hours on this list in the last 3 years, what have you done? I'm a moderator of flexcomponents list also, you should get Yahoo to get me out of there as well. I'm standing up for those who say nothing but are getting irritated with you. Bye, Mike On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Robert Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Mike...if you'd just stop posting personal message against me this would > all leave this group less cluttered. > > To answer your statement. > > Harassment is someone telling someone else to F___ off which Josh said to > me for simply informing others about FDT Enterprise 3.0 which has several > dozen enhancements to it's Eclipse IDE for [flexcoders] to structure their > code; take care of global renaming and much more. > Contribution is letting other Flexcoders know of any tools out there that > can provide them with higher quality, a more secure path for their > investment in time and money into their coding, and more options to display > on devices, including a group focused on GPU level programming for higher > performance. There's a great individual out there blogging about this and > the Pixel Bender kit as related to [flexcoding] but I need not inform you of > that, since you twist every contribution I try to make. > > I'm asking you politely to stop harassing me. If you have a petition that > you say you are secretly sending around to get me kicked off this list, then > I'm sure Yahoo will forward it to me, and I'll take action at that time if > there needs to be any proper handling of it, and your abusive attitude. > > Let people speak. Stop trying to stop good information out. For the last > time, direct your anger somewhere else, as it was in there a long time > before you saw me online; I'm pretty convinced of that given your words > which show your state of mind. > > Try to leave it alone. If you don't, that's your choice. But continued > personal comments about me are wrong to go unanswered when Yahoo is looking > into this. And nobody has done anything of extreme totality except for the > threatening words of Josh to me. If he's willing to say them in public > online from a distance, there's far more implications in the real world, > which is why Yahoo takes those comments so seriously. It's threatening in > an extreme aggressive way. > > -r > > On Sep 1, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > > > No, I don't think you have the capacity to understand what harassment is. > > > If there is any reason I don't stop it's because it's wrong to let a > message like this go without answering. > > No, you just hijack threads and change titles. > > > Your words are aggressive, > > damn right they are > > > A secret petition says a lot about you, not me. > > It does, it says I'm on the other side. > > Mike > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Robert Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> You are among a group. >> >> I have received some e-mails discussing the nature of bullies on the list. >> >> If there is any reason I don't stop it's because it's wrong to let a >> message like this go without answering. >> >> Your words are aggressive, not mine. I've not harassed you, you are >> harassing me (right now). >> >> A secret petition says a lot about you, not me. >> >> -r >> >> >> On Sep 1, 2008, at 6:29 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: >> >> >> > I think your comment below is level headed and good, and here's where I >> stop. >> >> You know how many times you said your going to stop? >> >> Robert, your alone and you know it. You just don't see the signs man, you >> don't see the petition to get you banned from this list that is going >> around. The users on this list are against you, not sucking in your warm >> beautiful sun rays. >> >> The funny thing is, the way you YELL at people and force false information >> down their throat,, by hijacking threads and changing titles, I'm sure this >> isn't the first time someone has told you to FO. >> >> PS If I was a moderator of this forum, I would have banned you with this >> last tirade. >> >> Mike >> >> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Robert Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm simply responding to the F___ O___ statement. >>> >>> There's no ego here. >>> >>> Everyone contributes different things. >>> >>> If FTD Enterprise 3.0 is not seen as a contribution with it's extensive >>> toolset as an Eclipse FLEX compiler that works with the FLEX SDK than I'd >>> say I disagree with you. >>> >>> Check out the tool and you'll see that it provides a lot of [flexcoding] >>> functionality that FLEX Builder does not. >>> >>> Someone else asked about the Store, I made a reply, and he replied to me >>> with a F___ O____ >>> >>> I think any reasonable person looking at the sequence can see that he >>> overstepped the bounds. >>> >>> If it was said to you, I think you'd report it also. >>> >>> I'm not trying to get him off the list. After responding to his >>> aggression I'll go back into my passive mode. >>> >>> But I can't let a cowardly comment like that go unanswered. >>> >>> -r >>> >>> On Aug 31, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Guy Morton wrote: >>> >>> Josh was perhaps ill-advised to put that in writing, but frankly, he just >>> wrote what others are by now no doubt thinking. >>> >>> Josh contributes MUCH more useful stuff to this list than you do Robert, >>> so if you really have other people's interests at heart you'd not be trying >>> to get him kicked off this list. The fact that you are suggests to me that >>> your ego has outgrown your common sense. >>> >>> Guy >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/09/2008, at 9:55 AM, Robert Thompson wrote: >>> >>> Because of your cursing, I won't respond to any more questions on this >>> thread. >>> >>> However, take the "we" out of your statement telling me to F___ O___ and >>> calling my detailed responses schizophrenic paranoid delusional. >>> >>> All others, attend the Webinar and try to protect your future by simply >>> getting things straightened out. If they change from what I've read, hurray >>> for Adobe! >>> >>> I'll leave it as a clear case of abuse in the form of expletives, and >>> names. >>> >>> - Goodbye, and please get some sleep or take your anger about your life >>> out on someone else. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 31, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Josh McDonald wrote: >>> >>> No, I won't get off your back, stop spamming the list with your insane >>> whining. "Ask Adobe" followed by 4 pages of your paranoid schizophrenic >>> delusional rambling is not "answering the question". >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Teoti Graphix, LLC >> http://www.teotigraphix.com >> >> Teoti Graphix Blog >> http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com >> >> You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'. >> >> >> > > > -- > Teoti Graphix, LLC > http://www.teotigraphix.com > > Teoti Graphix Blog > http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com > > You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'. > > > -- Teoti Graphix, LLC http://www.teotigraphix.com Teoti Graphix Blog http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'.
