thats the fastest for sure. personally i use mxmlc directly,but it gets a wee bit slow when the project gets big. one of my team members tried the fastmxmlc but according to him there weren't any/very little increase in compile times

On 3/22/06, Renaun Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After some more reading I am under the assumption that for development
of Flex 1.5 apps its better to use the Java web server access to
compile with caching on.  Is this correct?

Renaun

--- In [email protected], "Renaun Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ## This post is in regard to Flex 1.5 ##
>
> I have finally got around to trying out mxmlc and fastmxmlc with a xml
> build script.  The purpose was to see if it was faster to use mxmlc to
> compile on my development environment versus using the web server
> (accessing the mxml by a url).
>
> I am not seeing a big difference in compile time between the two
> methods.  I tried RSL's but dont think they are setup correctly.
>
> My big question is how do I get my compile times down on my local
> development machine?
>
> Renaun
>






--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






--
j:pn
http://www.lennel.org


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development
Macromedia flex Software development best practice


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to