Thanks Johannes for insight. Is this what you do as a developer on a dev box? Or only on the major builds on the deployment (staging/production) servers?
Renaun --- In [email protected], "Johannes Nel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hear hear on what david says. using ant we > update from svn > build unit tests app using mxmlc, if all tests pass > use mxmlc to build app > > so yeah it has its benefits :) > > so it is critical to the process as > On 3/22/06, Dave Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That depends what you mean by better. In Flex 1.5 you will find very > > quickly that the JIT server compiler leaks memory very badly and wont > > work with an application of any real size. For any kind of serious > > application the server compilation simply wont work for you. > > > > We use mxmlc called from autoamted ANT builds. We're pretty attament > > about it all. We have a very well designed build and source control > > process that has made real impacts on the quality and reliability of > > our solutions. > > > > Yeah, performance isnt stunning, but given that its a two pass > > compilation thats not shocking either. > > > > We're hoping for some marked improvement in Flex2. > > > > -- > > Dave Wolf > > Cynergy Systems, Inc. > > Macromedia Flex Alliance Partner > > http://www.cynergysystems.com > > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Office: 866-CYNERGY > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Renaun Erickson" <renaun@> wrote: > > > > > > After some more reading I am under the assumption that for development > > > of Flex 1.5 apps its better to use the Java web server access to > > > compile with caching on. Is this correct? > > > > > > Renaun > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Renaun Erickson" <renaun@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ## This post is in regard to Flex 1.5 ## > > > > > > > > I have finally got around to trying out mxmlc and fastmxmlc with a xml > > > > build script. The purpose was to see if it was faster to use mxmlc to > > > > compile on my development environment versus using the web server > > > > (accessing the mxml by a url). > > > > > > > > I am not seeing a big difference in compile time between the two > > > > methods. I tried RSL's but dont think they are setup correctly. > > > > > > > > My big question is how do I get my compile times down on my local > > > > development machine? > > > > > > > > Renaun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > j:pn > http://www.lennel.org > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
