|
For native Flash Player APIs, I'd log a bug against the
player... this isn't really a Flex decision. From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Spratt Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [flexcoders] is "delete" really the best/only way to remove a node in e4x? I am not really fussing
very hard, it is just that we have: XML.appendChild()
XML.insertChildAfter()
XML.insertChildBefore()
XML.prependChild() but no
XML.removeChild? delete is a completely
different style syntax. From:
I don't know whether it
is the best or only way, but it seems consistent with the use of the 'delete'
operator to remove a dynamic property of an Object. -
Gordon From:
If
this is the final API, I can deal with it, it is just
inconsistent and undocumented, and a bit of a shock when the rest of the api is
so clean and logical. I
admit I have not read the e4x specification. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
Title: is "delete" really the best/only way to remove a node in e4x?
- RE: [flexcoders] is "delete" really the best/only... Peter Farland
- RE: [flexcoders] is "delete" really the best... Gordon Smith
- RE: [flexcoders] is "delete" really the ... Francis Cheng
- [flexcoders] The Kiwi project (cool new app an... David Mendels
- [flexcoders] Max 2006 Darren Houle
- RE: [flexcoders] Max 2006 Joan Tan
- RE: [flexcoders] Max 2006 Ben Forta
- RE: [flexcoders] Max 2006 Darren Houle
- [flexcoders] Re: The Kiwi project (cool ne... dirtmediaworld
- [flexcoders] Re: The Kiwi project (co... bringrags

