RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService & Cairngorm 2 Example

[Steven Webster]

Darron makes some very fair points; our reasoning for the current Cairngorm implementation was driven from some findings we had during the beta, which no longer seem to apply.  We'll have some discussion internally to reinforce our decisions, but Darron's approach seems a sensible and valid one that we may likely end up bringing into the main codebase.     How would folks feel about us making that change ?  We're always very reticent of API changes for backward compatibility.....would folks be ok with this one ?   Steven   Steven Webster Practice Director (Rich Internet Applications) Adobe Consulting Westpoint, 4 Redheughs Rigg, South Gyle, Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ, UK p: +44 (0) 131 338 6108 m: +44 (0) 7917 428 947  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard Sent: 06 July 2006 16:07 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService & Cairngorm 2 Example Darron Schall just posted a great article about Cairngorm's Responder interface and what he considers to be a better alternative. http://www.darronschall.com/weblog/archives/000234.cfm __._,_.___ -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___