RE: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:04:42 -0700

Dave,

 

That is not true.

 

Swaping RemoteObject and WebService is not as easy as you make it out to be. Web Services typing errors are highly dependent on the server side implementation. Your team knows how to configure the server side with WebServices but most developers cannot do this.

 

With RemoteObject you get strong typing seamlessly in AMF3.

 

The move from WebServices to RemoteObjects is much easier than the inverse.

 

But then again you all are pros at Web Services. J

 

Ted Patrick

Flex Evangelist

Adobe Systems Incorporated

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Wolf
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 8:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides

 

One quite important thing to keep in mind is that in many cases (say
Java) the exact same servant class can be used for either RemoteObject
or WebService, which means the server-side processing actually is
basically identical. It also means that switching from RemoteObject
to a web service is almost as simple as copying the classes from one
directory to another.

--
Dave Wolf
Cynergy Systems, Inc.
Adobe Flex Alliance Partner
http://www.cynergysystems.com
http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]stems.com
Office: 866-CYNERGY

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, "Jack Caldwell" <jwcaldwell@...> wrote:
>
> Martin:
>
> OK . . . . so the lag time is when the data gets back to the end-user?
>
> Bottom line . . . . with all things being equal . . . .
>
> Does a web service request take longer to process on the server than
> a AMF request?
>
> If the answer is . . . . in general yes, then that can be an issue
with an
> increase in users.
>
> If the answer is . . . . it depends on the data being requested
and/or the
> data format then that seems to suggest that everyone must run tests to
> compare results and then test again based on scaling up.
>
> Is that about right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jack
>
> _____
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com] On
> Behalf Of Martin Wood
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 8:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
> Subject: Re: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend
systems
> - which provides
>
>
>
>
>
> Jack Caldwell wrote:
> > Dave:
> >
> > I agree that a 1/3 of a second is not going to be noticed by the
end-user.
> >
> > However, when you add 100s or 1,000s of users . . . . does that make a
> > difference?
> >
> > I don't know . . . . that's why I am asking. You guys have the
experience.
>
> It doesn't make any difference as the timings are on the client
side, not
> the
> server.
>
> There will be some difference in time required to handle requests on the
> server
> which may be down to the data format but they would have to be
investigated
> on a
> case by case basis.
>
> martin.
>

__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



__,_._,___

Reply via email to