> No I am not exaggerating. > Run a Web Services call on my mothers old Dell and you can count the > seconds. When AMF was first added to Flash Player 6, the primary reason > was performance on slow machines. AMF was much faster then and it > remains the case. XML parsing performance decays non-linearly on slower > machines and with larger xml documents.
I fully understand that AMF is faster than XML. I also understand that FDS offers us way more than just AMF. I also understand that FDS in general, and AMF in particular makes things much easier for developers. I just don't want to accept that XML is as slow as you make it appear to be ;) > Keep me honest Claus! I try ;) Cheers, Claus. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
