Jack,
 
You're welcome to express your opinions, even if they aren't the same as mine.
 
Opinions are good.
 
Paul
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:50 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Paul:
 
I have 200+ customers.
 
But as I said before, this isn't going to change anything, so in the future
I will just keep my opinions to myself.
 
Thanks for your opinion.
 
Jack


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Andrews
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:40 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Jack,
 
I suspect that you don't run a company of quite the same size of Adobe.
 
f you have one or two customers you can just issue a fix as soon as you've done QA. When you have thousands you have major distribution and support overheads that get more costly as you go on.
 
It's not a question of knowing how to plan, it's big number logistics.
 
Your not the only one whose been in software development for 27 years either..
 
Paul
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Paul:
 
Well . . . . . I must be doing something right . . . . for 27 years.
 
If you read my post completely I said I did not expect Adobe to be as quick
on fixes as I have been.
 
It would only be a nightmare, if they did not plan properly.
 
Maybe I just know how to plan and implement at a faster pace.
 
But thanks just the same.
 
Jack


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Andrews
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Jack,
 
I don't think you appreciate what a nightmare that would be for any development company. The sheer overhead of doing what you suggest would be immense. I don't know of a software company of any kind that operates like that. I think you've had the wrong position for 27 years..
 
Paul
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Jeff:
 
I fully understood what Matt was saying.  That's just it . . . . it is not a top priority.
 
The issue is that Adobe is fixing the bugs, but not releasing them.
 
We as developers have to try to figure it out then call support, etc.  That could take
hours or days of my time.  It's wasted time and money.
 
I am like you, I don't have a large support staff either.
 
My position, for over 27 years, has always been . . . . find a bug send ALL customers
a fix ASAP.  Not waiting for a customer to call me.
 
Again, in the first 6-9 months after a major release, I think there should be a different
release plan in place.
 
Thanks,
 
Jack


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Tapper
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Jack-

I think you misunderstand what Matt said.  He didn't say they aren't working on fixes, he said it hasnt been their top priority.  If you have an issue, he recommended you contact their support team. 

I have said this before, but I would not have a single customer if I told them I could not fix the software they
purchased because I was working on another version.

Again, its not an issue of not being able to fix bugs, many companies have a process in place to allow for handling their customers needs.  In the adobe case, if something isnt working as you would expect, there is the support channel.  drop them an email or give them a call, and they can help solve the issue you are having.  They are the ones who are best able to determine if you are doing something wrong, or if its a bug in the code which needs to be fixed.  I wouldnt be at all surprised if their were a number of minor patches available through the support channels.  I dont know that there are, but if I were them, and I had a few fixes to specific bugs that havent been reported by the community at large, but instead by a few customers, I would probably give the fixes as needed, rather than make a whole new big push.  Then again, thats just my thought process.  Sadly, I dont have a whole support team working for me, so i need to deal with bugs in my code as they crop up.


At 03:18 PM 8/30/2006, Jack Caldwell wrote:

Matt or anyone else at Adobe.
 
I agree that the quality of Flex Builder 2 is good . . . . very good . . . . however . . . .
 
I know nothing will probably change since Adobe is the big software company, and I am only a single
customer(Flex Builder 2 w/charting), but this position disturbs me.
 
It reminds me of the construction industry when a contractor builds or remodels my house.  I have paid
for the work and I find problems but the contractor is off working on another house and doesn't have the
time or resources to fix the problems in a timely manner.
 
To be honest, I could care less about a Mac version . . . . AND I know those wanting a Mac version could
care less about a Windows version.  So please no bashing from the Mac side.
 
It appears that Adobe has not allocated enough resources to the development team where they can have
2 groups.  As I recall, it was said on this forum, soon after Flex 2 was released the development team
received new Macs to begin work on a Mac version.
 
Why did Adobe not already have a plan and resources in place.  This type of thing is done all the time.
 
While I do not expect that every single bug be issued a "release patch", it would be very nice and customer
friendly to have a bug fix release plan in place and implement that plan.  Especially in the first 6-9 months of
a major release.
 
I haven't encountered a bug that I know of.  But when I do, I will probably have spent many hours or days
thinking I did not write the code right only to find out later is was a bug.  Wasted time . . . . money.
 
I have said this before, but I would not have a single customer if I told them I could not fix the software they
purchased because I was working on another version.
 
I really do not understand why large software companies employ this type of bug fix and update plan.
 
I only hope Adobe will rethink their strategy and implementation of releasing bug fixes.
 
My .02 or actually $ 749 for Flex Builder 2 w/charting.
 
Thanks,
 
Jack


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [ mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Are there specific bugs you’re looking to be addressed?  Based on direct feedback as well as observation from the various public forums we’ve been pretty pleased with the quality of the release so we’ve held off on rushing out an updater while we work on things like the Mac release of Flex Builder.  Doesn’t mean we’re not fixing bugs, but we’ve decided to try to address more issues in a longer cycle rather than fewer issues quickly.

If there’s a specific issue that is blocking your work use the wish form (http://www.adobe.com/go/wish) to submit it and indicate so.  There are also plenty of official support options available to help as well ( http://www.adobe.com/support/programs/flex/?tab:plans=1)

Matt


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [ mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Adam Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 2:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Flex 2 patch timeline

Before I dive headlong into my first full Flex 2 project, can anybody
from Adobe give me an update as to when/if there will be a patch for Flex 2?

Adam


__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to