Thank you Scott and JD ...

Can you guys please present a comparison of the 2 different approaches
that both of you are suggesting?

Thank you,
Mrinal





--- In [email protected], slangeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, your page needs to generate the content, which is imported to
Flash at
> runtime.
> 
> Sorry if the original link didn't cover the entire gamut. This may
have a
> better overview:
> 
> http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/02/27/using-alternate-content-flash/
> 
> -Scott
> 
> On 11/30/06, mrinal.wadhwa < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Hmm .. progressive development .. that's ok for the static
content on
> > my website but .. my goal here is to get the content of my blog
> > indexed .. I was planning to keep this content in an xml and make it
> > visible on the flex site using <HTTPService> .. I cant update the html
> > page every time I update my blog.
> >
> > :?
> >
> > Thank you for the help,
> > Mrinal
> >
> > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > slangeberg <slangeberg@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Check out this article on 'progressive enhancement':
> > >
> > >
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/articles/progressive_enhancement.html
> > >
> > > Basically, your content is on the page, whether flash is present
or not.
> > >
> > > -Scott
> > >
> > > On 11/30/06, mrinal wadhwa <mrinal.wadhwa@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I know that something similar has been discussed here before but I
> > am new
> > > > to Flex and need some more clarity.
> > > > I am making my personal website in Flex (just so that I could
> > learn flex)
> > > > , the website will have my blog and my picture gallery .... now
> > here's what
> > > > I want to do:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1. Google should index all my blog posts
> > > > 2. When some one searches for some content that is present on my
> > > > site he/she should get a link that takes him or her to the
> > exact content and
> > > > not to my applications home
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you all for your help,
> > > > Mrinal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > : : ) Scott
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> : : ) Scott
>


Reply via email to