You don't have to read it Tim.
   
  It's Bruce's personal opinion just as your request is a personal request.
   
  It's real simple, you don't own this ofrum.
   
  And I'm not sure personal requests are given priority here.
   
  I happen to agree with Bruce; and I'm totally devoted to Adobe.
   
  But Macromedia has handled things better in the past and I hope things 
improve.
   
  We need Errata to know what's going on.
   
  It's my personal request that you don't flame me for my personal opinion.
   
  ;-/

Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
            Agreed :)
   
  ( I got half-way down and went *noise..noise...noise...heh go 
Claus...noise..noise*) :)
   
  

 
  On 1/7/07, Tim Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:               As a personal 
request, might I ask that this thread be closed.  It's very easy to take 
pot-shots from the sidelines.  But, from what I can tell, most on this list are 
serious people that appreciate the hard work and dedication that Adobe has 
provided.  Granted, Flex isn't mature yet as a product.  However, a lot of 
people here have gone through the beta cycles and come out just fine.  After 
all, progress isn't free.  It just takes a little effort.  
  That being said, please let us not sink into the same type of discourse that 
has plagued similar lists.  If you're not a fan of Adobe and Flex, than this 
probably isn't the right place for you.  They have a customer service 
department for that.  In the mean time, all of the positive minded subscribers 
to this list have much more useful things to do with their time than reading 
personal rants.  Sorry for the bluntness, but if you cant say something 
nice......... 
  -TH  

--- In [email protected], "boy_trike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>
> Its great that there is an upgrade to 2.0.1 So where is the READ ME telling 
> us about the 
> changes. (oh yea, you can find a web page that tells you that there is 
> something called 
> modules and you can now change style sheets dynamically. but where are: 
> 
> 1). The examples
> 2). The new syntax changes
> 3). The list of the 250 bugs that are fixed (or are we supposed to guess 
> which ones they 
> got?)
> 
> We should NOT have to find out about these features on someones blog. This 
> seems very 
> amateurish to me. 
> 
> 
> Bruce
>

  
  








-- 
Regards, 
Scott Barnes
http://www.mossyblog.com   

         

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to