Fair enough Robert. Go ahead, make this flashcoders 2. Subject dropped. -TH
btw, all I own is my keyboard. --- In [email protected], Robert Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You don't have to read it Tim. > > It's Bruce's personal opinion just as your request is a personal request. > > It's real simple, you don't own this ofrum. > > And I'm not sure personal requests are given priority here. > > I happen to agree with Bruce; and I'm totally devoted to Adobe. > > But Macromedia has handled things better in the past and I hope things improve. > > We need Errata to know what's going on. > > It's my personal request that you don't flame me for my personal opinion. > > ;-/ > > Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed :) > > ( I got half-way down and went *noise..noise...noise...heh go Claus...noise..noise*) :) > > > > > On 1/7/07, Tim Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a personal request, might I ask that this thread be closed. It's very easy to take pot-shots from the sidelines. But, from what I can tell, most on this list are serious people that appreciate the hard work and dedication that Adobe has provided. Granted, Flex isn't mature yet as a product. However, a lot of people here have gone through the beta cycles and come out just fine. After all, progress isn't free. It just takes a little effort. > That being said, please let us not sink into the same type of discourse that has plagued similar lists. If you're not a fan of Adobe and Flex, than this probably isn't the right place for you. They have a customer service department for that. In the mean time, all of the positive minded subscribers to this list have much more useful things to do with their time than reading personal rants. Sorry for the bluntness, but if you cant say something nice......... > -TH > > --- In [email protected], "boy_trike" <boy_trike@> wrote: > > > > Its great that there is an upgrade to 2.0.1 So where is the READ ME telling us about the > > changes. (oh yea, you can find a web page that tells you that there is something called > > modules and you can now change style sheets dynamically. but where are: > > > > 1). The examples > > 2). The new syntax changes > > 3). The list of the 250 bugs that are fixed (or are we supposed to guess which ones they > > got?) > > > > We should NOT have to find out about these features on someones blog. This seems very > > amateurish to me. > > > > > > Bruce > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Scott Barnes > http://www.mossyblog.com > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
