FYI, my comment was based on errata not the Subject Line.
I think everyone here likes Adobe or they wouldn't be using their software to
base their solutions on it.
To be clear, I was agreeing with the body of the message, not the subject
line.
No need for flame wars here. Everyone has a right to their opinion; that's
how things get noticed. I think Adobe is working their butts off to make this
transition, and I like it.
I also am planning much of my future on FLEX2 so I hope bugs and errors are
properly documented in each issue -- that's all.
-r
Tim Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fair enough Robert. Go ahead, make this flashcoders 2. Subject
dropped.
-TH
btw, all I own is my keyboard.
--- In [email protected], Robert Thompson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't have to read it Tim.
>
> It's Bruce's personal opinion just as your request is a personal
request.
>
> It's real simple, you don't own this ofrum.
>
> And I'm not sure personal requests are given priority here.
>
> I happen to agree with Bruce; and I'm totally devoted to Adobe.
>
> But Macromedia has handled things better in the past and I hope
things improve.
>
> We need Errata to know what's going on.
>
> It's my personal request that you don't flame me for my personal
opinion.
>
> ;-/
>
> Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed :)
>
> ( I got half-way down and went *noise..noise...noise...heh go
Claus...noise..noise*) :)
>
>
>
>
> On 1/7/07, Tim Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a
personal request, might I ask that this thread be closed. It's very
easy to take pot-shots from the sidelines. But, from what I can
tell, most on this list are serious people that appreciate the hard
work and dedication that Adobe has provided. Granted, Flex isn't
mature yet as a product. However, a lot of people here have gone
through the beta cycles and come out just fine. After all, progress
isn't free. It just takes a little effort.
> That being said, please let us not sink into the same type of
discourse that has plagued similar lists. If you're not a fan of
Adobe and Flex, than this probably isn't the right place for you.
They have a customer service department for that. In the mean time,
all of the positive minded subscribers to this list have much more
useful things to do with their time than reading personal rants.
Sorry for the bluntness, but if you cant say something nice.........
> -TH
>
> --- In [email protected], "boy_trike" <boy_trike@> wrote:
> >
> > Its great that there is an upgrade to 2.0.1 So where is the READ
ME telling us about the
> > changes. (oh yea, you can find a web page that tells you that
there is something called
> > modules and you can now change style sheets dynamically. but
where are:
> >
> > 1). The examples
> > 2). The new syntax changes
> > 3). The list of the 250 bugs that are fixed (or are we supposed
to guess which ones they
> > got?)
> >
> > We should NOT have to find out about these features on someones
blog. This seems very
> > amateurish to me.
> >
> >
> > Bruce
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes
> http://www.mossyblog.com
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
