--- In [email protected], "Scott Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul: How many?
37... I don't know... I don't even work in that group. I just know that it has been very lucrative. I shouldn't even be responding to this rant. I'm not too sure how to respond to it really. I don't really understand why people think that Adobe needs to be creating products that suit the needs of every user. If you want a .NET Remoting solution then build one, WebORB did it, why can't you? Adobe is making products that make sense for their main customers, and I'm sorry to say that isn't us. > > Seriously, throw the numbers on the table because I got to tell you, both > pre-Microsoft and post-Microsoft things haven't changed that radically that > DMS is more favoured then SAAS. SAAS is the new SOA dream, and people want > it because it's less red-tape to fight for a capital expense claim against > not only software but now hardware + bodies to support the software that was > bought. SAAS delegates that problem to someone else to solve and so it means > in theory less bodies to support the infrastructure and more focus on > supporting the users if need be. > > Not saying DMS is dead by any stretch, i'm sure LiveCycle solves a million > and one points of interest in this space and it does look compelling when > you separate it away from FLEX for a bit. Yet, let's take a step back and > look at the bigger picture, how does FLEX developers world-wide get any wins > from having LiveCycle in the room, and what percentage of them are in favour > of LiveCycle development being slotted in front of FLEX? > > 2002 Paul, I've been waiting since 2002.. I waded through swapping and > changing of Flash Framework directions (V1 to V2) like the rest of some of > us on this list. I waited for Royale to hit the street only to watch it > crash and burn due to price tag issues (which we all said loud and clear > this bites! - listen to the customers is a tip). I watched CENTRAL get > thrown our way, and was glad we could use this concept and wondered why it > went away (EULA and again not consulting customers first was the > perception). I watched as FLEX 2.0 came back, but free only the whole > remoting piece dropped off the radar and came back as Flex Data Services. > Only Its hard to find someone whom will host this product (why?) and > secondly it doesn't support .NET and Java anymore? it's only Java? (It's not > as if Remoting + .NET has been a mystery, it was there in the past and if > the WebORB folks for example can make it happen? surely Adobe could). > > It's 2007 and I'm seeing Apollo have "PDF" Integration (which raises an > eyebrow on whom this is really for - could be conspiracy theory going off > signal, happy to eat crow if i'm wrong on this one as i'm not absolutely > sure). Flex Data Services now has a new name, LiveCycle Data Services and > FLEX 3 well.. i won't bother... I don't know all the answers but at the very > least, I'm seeing all the warning signs of the past and for once, i'd like > to raise this (once bit -ok, twice bit -fair enough, thrice bit no thanks). > > 2002 - 2007, we should be knee deep in RIA happiness and I should be still > on the street making bundles of $$ and not working for Microsoft. Fact of > the matter is I'm working for them, because to be openly honest i'm going to > start over my RIA quest and see what these guys do with Silverlight and WPF > as I've done my tour of duty with FLEX and have lots of scars to prove it > (It wasn't all bad, I did make a nice living and once I broke through the > learning barrier and was able to memorize the entire framework it was easy > just lots of fingers on keyboard stuff). > > Good luck with that.
