*sigh* you wanna play politics Mike, go for it, but if you spent more time focusing on the products and the issues developers face daily instead of engaging in politics around the semantics of what exactly should be disclosed vs shouldn't - on a public forum, that's not owned by Adobe - go for it.
More to the point, this is my opinion and not of my employer (as per previous emails) so no, it's not relevant and while you assume my job is to compete with Adobe it's actually not, I deal with developers in all stacks around the web. So, if Adobe want to go this whole "us vs them" attitude, then you're a fool. As there are .NET developers out there whom use your products and part of my role is also engaging these folks and helping them through these hurdles. I deal with a lot of .NET folk whom need help withe FLEX (thus why I promote WebORB as a nice end to end solution so far) Sad part of all Mike is if you actually read the post and focused on it, I'm *praising* FLEX and advocating it could do better (which if we were competiting would mean bad for us right?). All I am asking is give the developers more power in delivering their potential instead of reserving it for Enterprise firstly, getting caught up in this Microsoft is evil war and lastly forcing a technology like LiveCycle into the equation. How's that "misleading"? - less time mud slinging the same old rant (you'e done this before on Ted's blog and got the same responses) and more focus on doing whatever it is you do at Adobe. btw. I've not only bought Adobe products, but I've sold them on your behalf, so with all due respect I'm still paying customer first, brand second. Focus on that. On 4/25/07, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott, Don't you think you should make it clear in your emails that you work for Microsoft, as an evangelist with technologies that compete directly with Flash and Flex? I know you mentioned it a couple of times, but you are emailing from a gmail account, and don't put your Microsoft affiliation in your sig. That seems a little misleading to me. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mesh%40adobe.com> Scott Barnes wrote: > > > heh, FUD, Troll and there was another one .. think it was "sell-out" > from memory... I've heard them all dude :) > > Just for fun, I did a google of *Brian Lesser + Macromedia*, you seem to > be a very vocal member of the community, so given i'm "trolling" does > that make you "fanboi"? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanboy <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanboy > > > (gets silly when we call each other names like this don't you think?) > > Scott. > > Connect with others. > > . > >
-- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com
