I think you are right that .NET support should be there, although I am not a .NET developer and probably never will be. I wonder if Microsoft could develop this solution? In theory they would have the best resources to understand .NET and enough people have figured out the protocols used in FDS that they should be able to develop this.
Anyway, the big flaw in your argument is that Adobe doesn't need to built the solution when there is one on the market already. Paul --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "mvbaffa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I beleive that Adobe wants to increase its participation in > the software development market. .NET is very good and its number of > developers is huge. That's why they should not be fogotten. > > This at least is naive. > > Adobe has one thing that Microsoft does not have, FLASH. This is the > key to success if it is well conducted. > > I do not care about politics. I really do not care which is the winner > Microsoft or Adobe. The winner will be the one that can deploy good and > affordable products. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Bjorn Schultheiss > <bjorn.schultheiss@> wrote: > > > > Think again. > > > > > > > > On 27/04/2007, at 11:26 AM, mvbaffa wrote: > > > > > Everybody uses Windows, almost all the workstations are windows. > Macs > > > have IE working OK. > > >
