Aww, what about us non-FDS guys, Matt? :-( Protecting the FDS revenue stream I take it? Actually, I would love to use FDS, but unfortunately this app requires a .NET backend and doesn't have the budget for FDS or WebOrb anyway.
Oh well, time to start coding... :-) Shaun --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FDS will do some of this work for you automatically, one reason why we > didn't write an updated version of the blog post :-) > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Shaun > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:32 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [flexcoders] Data Paging a la Matt Chotin for > Flex 2.1 > > > > Jurgen, > > Thanks for the tip. I checked them out, but unfortunately, those > implementations don't address my main issue: getting the data from the > server in a paged fashion. They simply allow you to view an > arraycollection in chunks, where Matt's goes back to the server as > needed to get chunks of the data. > > With 150k records, I need the on demand paging. > > Shaun > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Jurgen Beck <jurgen@> wrote: > > > > Hey Shaun, > > > > You may want to check out the FlexBox components list. There are two > > components, one for a paged DataGrid, the other one for a paged > > ArrayCollection. > > > > http://flexbox.mrinalwadhwa.com/ > > > > Jurgen > > > > Shaun wrote: > > > > > > I am getting ready to implement a report for a project that requires > > > the user to be able to sift through a maximum of 150,000 records > from a > > > table (yes, we all know that in reality this is ridiculous, but we > also > > > know that customers get what customers want). > > > > > > I read through Matt Chotin's posts on large datasets and will likely > go > > > down that path, but I'm in a time cruch and so the hope of saving > some > > > time, I am curious as to whether anyone has already ported ! his > samples > > > to 2.1 as they are from way back in 04. > > > > > > Or, if anyone has a better option, I'm all ears. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shaun > > > > > > Matt's post: > > > > http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mchotin/archives/2004/05/large_data_sets _2 > > > > > <http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mchotin/archives/2004/05/large_data_set s_ > 2> > > > .cfm > > > > > > > > >
