When I rebooted and retested this morning the problems changed. On .16 DTR and RTS are no longer switched. I can now key with MOX down. But the biggest change is in the CW waveform. Now seems well formed, but has a strong carrier. Also the display shows a 4khz wide signal when transmitting. Perhaps the wrong DSP filter is being used?
Tks, Ed > -----Original Message----- > From: Edward H Russell [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:56 PM > To: Tim Ellison > Cc: [email protected]; 'Greg Jurrens'; [email protected]; 'Stephen > Hicks N5AC' > Subject: RE: 2.0.16 CW problems > > Tim, > > Thanks for following up. I was reluctant to post this on the reflector but > it seems .16 is a public beta. I am available for further testing or info > at any time. > > 73 Ed > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:03 PM > > To: Edward H Russell > > Cc: [email protected]; Greg Jurrens; [email protected]; Stephen > > Hicks N5AC ([email protected]) > > Subject: 2.0.16 CW problems > > > > Ed, > > > > I have created DE374 in the developers bug tracker for this defect > report. > > The guys are working on a lot of CW fixes and should test for these > > problems as a result of vetting out the new code. Thanks for the > > feedback. > > > > -Tim > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:flexedge-boun...@flex- > > radio.biz] On Behalf Of Edward H Russell > > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:01 PM > > To: 'flexedge' > > Subject: [FlexEdge] 2.0.16 CW problems > > > > Today II tried to move my CW operation from 2.0.14 to 2.0.16 but ran > > into numerous problems: > > > > > > > > 1. The keying envelope is extremely soft on the leading edge. > > Switching back and forth it's nearly perfect in 2.0.14, and way off in > > 15 and 16 > > > > 2. COM port keying RTS and DTR have been reversed > > > > 3. Keying no longer works when MOX is pressed > > > > 4. There was a situation where I was definitely in CWU mode but it > > was > > transmitting AM: carrier and sidetone > > > > > > > > I did notice an apparent improvement in the T/R transition, with less > > switching noise and the AGC recovery seemed quicker. But I can't be > > sure if these are really improvements, or just side effects of other > > things not working. > > > > > > > > Has anyone else seen these problems? > > > > > > > > This comes in the wake of excellent receive latency results. I used my > > usual method of measuring the delay in arrival of beacon signals from > > expect propagation delay. The results ranged from 40ms at 192khz > > sampling, to 96ms at 48khz sampling. By far the best results I've seen! > > > > > > > > 73 Ed W2RF > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flexedge mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz > > This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is > > used for posting topics related to SDR software development and > > experimentalist who are using beta versions of the software. _______________________________________________ Flexedge mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are using beta versions of the software.
