I do not believe that the intent is to make this a static site. It is
to provide a basic set of documentation that gets updated and is
redistributed with _new_ downloads. The documentation pages should be
restricted update to some group of users(??), but there needs to be a
set of discussion pages that allow the documentation pages to be
discussed to an open set of the internet at large. See [1] and [2].

I am only moving it to another site temporarily, but it needs to be on
a site running FlexWiki 2.0 as some of the samples only work on that
codebase. It would be returned to FlexWiki once upgrade has happened.

[1]: 
http://www.flexwiki.com/default.aspx/FlexWiki/DiscussionPageImplementation.html
[2]: 
http://www.flexwiki.com/default.aspx/FlexWiki/DiscussionPageImplementationDiscuss.html

John Davidson

On 9/12/07, Astralis Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the whole point is to create a static site out of the wiki, then there is
> a fundamental flaw in how the wiki is designed.  I do agree that if that
> pages can never be restored (or very difficult to restore) then that needs
> fixed ASAP.  This should be priority 1.  If that can get solved then trying
> to make a static documentation site will be irrelevant.
>
> Additionally, if you're cleaning up the documentation by moving it to a
> different site, that's fine but it needs to be cleaned up on FW too --
> probably more important to clean it there than elsewhere.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users

Reply via email to