Bernie Bright wrote:
> > Refactoring SimGear is probably a Good Thing since it has accumulated > some cruft over time and some areas need reworking. However I don't > think that having bogus top level classes is a good idea. Instead I > propose we use namespaces. Perhaps a top level SimGear namespace with Okay, I've uploaded a new document (SimGear-0_2.API) at: http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/docs/ Thi should reflect most of the things I've heard before and incoorporates it into the previous document. Erik _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
