Bernie Bright wrote: > I've been using the Boost libraries (http://www.boost.org) for some time > now and that is what they do. Portability is one of Boost's goals. I > also wouldn't mind the opportunity to refactor the compiler > configuration stuff similar to how Boost has done it.
This might be a problem since boost (as far I've seen so far) doesn't use STL, which is the main reason in FlightGear for doing the things the way they are now. Erik _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
