On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 04:00:03PM -0000, Jim Wilson wrote: > Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I'd be happier if we kept it as is. Wouldn't be the first time > > engineers have traded correctness for pragmatism. > > > > Ah pragmatism! Is that the excuse engineers use when they get their vectors > math bass-ackwards? ;-)
Bah humbug. Engineers, seeing that there were two incompatable standards simply choose to break the one normally seen by people who should be able to understand the problem and adapt. Obviously, in this case, they chose the wrong group. :) -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
