-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 04:06:13PM -0800, Alex Perry wrote: [..bait snipped..] > Purely on principle, I think it is more important to let each FDM > subsystem use whatever conventions that its authors believe will make > for a consistent and easy to maintain codebase. We want them to work! > Any sign (or axis) mismatches can be dealt with in the interface class. FWIW, that's what I was trying to say: Internal (and external) interfaces should be standardized. That's what interfaces are for, right? - -- Regards, "I RADIS, do you?" =Martin= http://www.iradis.org/ PGP: FE87448B DDF8 677C 9244 D119 4FE0 AE3A 37CF 3458 FE87 448B From: Martin van Beilen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 04:06:13PM -0800 X-S-Issue: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002/02/17 10:09:58 aaccadb4366757ec7f3788cb9f66b74b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAjxvc20ACgkQN880WP6HRIsKQwCgo2PGlVYpezy8v7PSKSecnyS+ rt8AnRG2HTIM444HPuw96cf+BFCgxdMt =krCX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
