Norman Vine wrote:
 > Unless runways aren't anywhere near as flat in reality as I was
 > trained to build them when I was in the Corp of Engineers I wouldn't
 > expect a difference of 1-2 meters in a horizontal direction to be more
 > then a couple of centimeters in the vertical.  < ie dy/dx usually <
 > 1/100 >

Once more: ski jumps.  I can assure you, without a shadow of doubt,
that the deck of the Illustrious is nowhere near as flat as the
runways you built in the army. :)

And even so, it's not the *position* of the gear tip that is the
problem, it is the *direction* of the compression vector.  An 20
degree difference from vertical (not a terribly uncommon AoA for a jet
touchdown, or bank angle for a stiff crosswind landing) can results in
a translation of sin(20) (about 34%) of the gear length.  The
difference in spring force between a gear compressed by 34% and one
that isn't compressed is very large.

And again, it is true that under almost all circumstances we could
just assume that gear compressed "down" regardless of aircraft
orientation and get away with it.  But we already make an even better
assumption -- that the ground will be a flat plane.  If you think
about it, the assumptions are basically the same.  All the
circumstances where we'd get away with "down-only" gear compression
are already handled just as well (or better*) by our existing "flat
runway" assumption.  Like I said, if we're going to do it, we should
do it right.

Andy

* YASim can use the flat earth to compute a consistently flat runway
   for the gear to press against, for example.  With a per-gear
   elevation like this, there would be no way to prevent the airplane
   from seeing a "stair-step" (really, escalator) configuration
   instead, which doesn't make any physical sense.

-- 
Andrew J. Ross                NextBus Information Systems
Senior Software Engineer      Emeryville, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              http://www.nextbus.com
"Men go crazy in conflagrations.  They only get better one by one."
  - Sting (misquoted)


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to