David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jim Wilson writes: > > > Ok, I think this means I can continue in the same direction with > > the viewer code. It would be just a matter of editing xml to > > switch from using /position/lat||lon||alt to somewhere else in the > > property tree, so if folks want to experiment they can. > > I don't know if that will be necessary. As long as we agree that the > lat/lon/alt give a fixed position (somewhere) on the plane, that's > good enough, and it becomes a convention to be agreed upon model by > model. I agree with Jon that when the manufacturer does specify an > origin, we should use that. >
Err umm...what is it that won't be necessary? Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
