On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:43, Frederic Bouvier wrote: > From: "David Megginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Frederic Bouvier writes: > > > > > The c172 is flyable now but I thing the stall don't reproduce the > > > real behaviour. I thing it should dive more frankly. Now it seems > > > to stay flat ! > > > > My changes shouldn't affect the stall, except for any roll component. > > I've read that the C172 often stalls very gently, so it might not be > > right to expect a screaming dive -- I haven't tried stalls yet on the > > real thing. > > > To stall, I try to keep my altitude while the engine is put idle. So I > should see an increase of the AoA while pulling the stick before the > stall and then a decrease to a negative number. Now in real life I would > release the stick and push the throttle to recover 300ft lower. >
>With the JSBsim model, I don't see the decrease of AoA at stall. This is due to the lack of stall hysteresis modeling. We'll need to do some infrastructure work before we can support this. > Instead, > the plane keeps it AoA with the stick completely pulled. It does actually lose some as it goes over the top of the lift curve, but I do agree that it's not nearly enough. > It do not swivel > aroung its CG like a real plane ! > > -Fred > > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Tony Peden [EMAIL PROTECTED] We all know Linux is great ... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. -- attributed to Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
