Christian Mayer writes:

 > Great that we've got a standard place for these properties now.
 > 
 > But I'm really concerned that these values aren't in SI units.
 >
 > So most of the world (except the US and perhaps a few other countries)
 > can't use those units anymore without big research (aks somebody around
 > here what a 'slug' is... [*I* know it, but that doesn't count]).

I have no objection personally to doing everything in SI -- I'm
Canadian, so I'm very used to metric.  When we've had this discussion
before, however, most developers were very strongly opposed to
standardizing on SI internally, and it's certainly true that even in
Canada (which switched to metric in the 1970s) we still use feet,
inches of mercury, knots, and statute miles for aviation-related
weather (but a Canadian ATIS broadcast *will* use celsius for
temperature).

In the end, I'm probably going to make the properties available in
several flavours, so the main question will be what's used internally.
It's not just a matter of SI vs. Imperial -- for example, for
temperature we have to choose among Celsius, Kelvin, Fahrenheit, and
Rankine, while for pressure, we have atmospheres, bar, mbar, inHg,
inH2O, kgf/m^2, Pa, lbf/ft^2, mmHg, and many others.  Yech.

 > If a FDM wants to use obscure units internally (e.g. because the
 > developers are use to them) that's their choice. But when we have
 > very universal data that a lot of people need (users, panel
 > programmers, ...)  we should use an international standard.

I agree with the principle, but note that the aircraft panel
instruments give the altitude in feet, not meters, the altimeter will
be calibrated for inches of mercury, not pascals, and the airspeed
will be in knots (or possibly statute mph), not kph -- using SI
internally will force a lot of conversions.  I'm sure that there exist
SI aircraft panels somewhere, but I have not yet seen photos of any in
general aviation.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to