Curtis L. Olson writes:

> Jonathan Polley writes:
> > I have a few questions brought about by some recent experiences, but
> > what they boil down to is "Are we going to reestablish the minimun
> > system requirements for FlightGear." 
> > 
> > First, due to deficiencies in the compiler, it is becoming more and
> > more difficult to build FlightGear under MSVC 6.0.  
> 
> Does MS have something newer people can migrate to that works better?

I hear VERY good things about STLPort and MSVC6
I also hear that MSVC 7 fixed most of the 'non standard'
mscv'ism's

Norman


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to