Erik Hofman writes:

 > I haven't, I still supose the base package falls under the GPL.
 > But I like to keep it GPL and nothing less restrictive.
 > 
 > Also not that none of my code contributions have an explicit copyright 
 > in the header, which means they fall under the same license terms of 
 > FlightGear (GPL now, and maybe LGPL later).

Perhaps the licensing status of the base package should be our first
concern.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to