Andy Ross writes: > Magnificent. Maybe now someone will look at the issue. I reported > this a while back, and Keith Whitwell's response was essentially that > FlightGear was too big and complicated to use as a test case. :(
Keith does make a good point, simple test cases are the most ideal in terms of debugging problems, but the flip side is that you run the risk of building drivers that only work on the simple test cases. Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
