Did I tell you that the F-16 panel starts looking _great_ ?!!!
Yes, it is indeed! Here's an issue that you might not have come across though: the HUD is placed incorrectly when the aspect ratio of the FGFS window is too small (window isn't wide enough for its height).
This is a problem with the HUD code (the panel suffers from it also, but it's less noticable).
BTW. I still know several issues to improve the panel even more, but thanks for the compliment.
And the plane is even nice to fly: It's not as fast as the TSR.2 but it's much more versatile - and this pleases very much !
Are you sure? I seem to experience the opposite -- the plain F-16 is stronger and faster than the TSR.2 with full reheat! Versatility is debatable, but I agree that the F-16 rolls a lot faster, which can come in handy when those MiG-29 are closing in.
We still use the F-100-PW-100 (or was it PW-110) engine which can drive the F-16 up to Mach 1.45 while the engine which is suposed to be in the F-16 Block 32 (which I am modelling) uses the F-100-PW-220 engine which drives the F-16 to Mach 2.03 ...
Approach speed of the F-16 is pleasantly low, which is great especially because it makes up for the need of usable wheelbrakes :-(.
I'm workin on it. The next step will be adding leading edge flaps and the speedbrakes which would make landing much easier.
Erik
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
