> After a bit of experimentation, I see little benefit in the 1arcsec > data for our needs. We can't even come any where close to rendering > the full 3arcsec data. We are talking about preserving the top 1% > most important data points from the 3 arcsec data. For the 1arcsec > data we'd only be able to preserve about 0.1% of the original data. > So at the levels of detail we use, 3arcsec data is *more* than > enough. Using 1arcsec data would still be nice, but probably not > noticibly nicer.
Sorry for the lame question, but how far are the sample points apart from each other in feet with the 3 arc second data? How far is it for the 1? tnx. g. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
