Jim Wilson writes: > Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > And I don't think it's fair to demand a > > painles recompile of the *developers* version of FlightGear every minute > > of the day. > > Agree with all you said, except maybe this. "Demand" is one thing, "expect" > is another. It is fair to demand it. I'm not talking about you or this > update, but a few minutes of short cutting by one can cause cummulative hours > of trouble for other developers. And effectively shut down new work. On the > other hand we shouldn't "expect" painless recompile, that just isn't > realistic. I think that is probably what you meant.
I just get panicy when things are broke, and the longer they stay broke the more paniced I get. Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
