"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So long as we knew where 0,0,0 is.  The ac3d model for the p51d has 0,0,0 at
> the nose.  It seems like a clear easy to understand reference point.

Although it might be easy to understand, this definitely misses the idea of
a reference point. When you're modelling an aircraft, nothing it that much
likely to vary than the nose and the tail because the manufacturer probably
has modified the plane and there exist different versions with different
noses (this is quite likely to occur), there may be inaccurate data on the
nose geometry, when modelling a plane in low resolution for FlightGear you
have to take some restrictions into account that affect the geometry of the
nose, it depends on the taste of the person modelling the plane, ....

The nose simply is a point of less relevance to the aircraft compared to
things like wing root for example. After modifications to the wing root of a
(real) airplane you are still able to extrapolate the 'original' reference
point. This is impossible with the nose in most cases,

Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to