That has nothing at all to do with what I said. We are controlling individual control surfaces. Period. I don't think we should have subclasses for each desired action/process. Only each control surface type. Roll control ends up being intrinsically part of aileron control is it not? Pitch control is intrinsically part of elevator control, regardless of whether you are targeting speed or pitch (maybe you are confusing control targets with outputs?). The variable input sources and targets and how those are handled are all that needs to be configured per instance. Keeping it to that will make the configuration process much simpler.
That's not entirely true. For example (AFAIK) B-727 uses ailerons as a means of roll control on lower speeds, and speed brakes on higher speeds. The other example might be MU-2, AC that relies entirely on speedbrakes for roll control (i.e no ailerons at all).
ciao,
Gordan
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
